MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416897235 · doi:10.5194/se-16-1473-2025

New paleoseismological and morphotectonic investigations along the 2018 surface ruptures of the Fiandaca Fault, eastern flank of Etna volcano (Italy)

2025· article· en· W4416897235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSolid Earth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrenchVolcanoPaleoseismologyFlankFault (geology)LavaFault scarpTephraNeotectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. We present the first paleoseismological results along the Fiandaca Fault, source of the 26 December 2018, Mw 5.0 Fleri earthquake. This earthquake caused extensive damage and 8 km of surface faulting. We excavated two exploratory trenches close to the Fiandaca village, in the central segment of the 2018 coseismic rupture. Analysis of trench walls allows identifying, besides the 2018 event, two additional historical surface faulting events. Based on amount of displacement of dated stratigraphic units, including tephra from the 122 BCE eruption, these historical events were similar to the 2018 earthquake. The most recent one occurred in the period 1281–1926 CE, most likely during the1894 earthquake. The oldest one, previously unknown, occurred in the Early Middle Ages (757–894 CE). When compared with the available seismic catalogue for Mt. Etna volcano, this paleoseismic evidence might suggest increased seismic activity along the Fiandaca Fault in the last centuries. In order to test this hypothesis, we conducted detailed morphotectonic analyses and throw rate measurements across offset historical lava flows. In addition, we developed a trishear kinematic model that describes the fault zone and the morphological features of the scarps. Throw rates mean values show an increase from 3.3 mm yr−1 since the Greek-Roman period reaching 7.8 mm yr−1 since the Late Middle Ages. These findings highlight the needs of further investigations to evaluate the slip rates variations of other faults accommodating the flank instability. Our findings confirm that paleoseismological and morphotectonic studies are of critical value for defining surface faulting and seismic hazard in volcanic settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it