MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416898650 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.106183

Investigating factors affecting the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia in meat-type poultry: A meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4416898650 on OpenAlexafffund
Baran Amini, Ricarda E Jahnel, Bayode O. Makanjuola, Xuechun Bai, Shai Barbut, Alexandra Harlander, J.L. Ellis, Christine F. Baes, Emily M. Leishman

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)ObesityBody weightPhosphorusBody mass indexLower body

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tibial Dyschondroplasia (TD) is the accumulation of growth plate cartilage in the proximal end of the tibiotarsus bone and has persisted as a major skeletal disorder in the poultry industry, continuing to negatively impact both profitability and animal welfare. Studies have reported potential effects of genetic selection, nutrition, and body weight on TD incidence, but these relationships vary between studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis, to identify factors contributing to TD incidence, with 41 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. It was predicted that variables such as body weight (kg), sex, species, age (weeks), dietary calcium to phosphorus ratio (Ca:P), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and the decade of publication would have an impact on the incidence of TD. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of independent variables to predict TD incidence while including study as a random effect. Results indicated that increased body weight (0.13 ± 0.028; P < 0.0001) was associated with a higher TD incidence. TD incidence varied by species (P < 0.0001), with a greater effect observed in turkeys (0.16 ± 0.027; P < 0.0001) compared to broilers (0.10 ± 0.140; P = 0.475). In broilers, TD incidence decreased with age (P < 0.0001), with a slightly steeper decline in females (-0.28 ± 0.066; P < 0.0001) compared to males. The decade of study (70s-80 s, 90 s, and 2000s-2020s) was associated with TD incidence (P = 0.041), with incidence at its lowest in the 2000s-2020s (0.19 ± 0.044; P < 0.0001), and highest in the 70s-80s (0.37 ± 0.052; P = 0.028). An increase in the Ca:P ratio corresponded to a larger decline in TD incidence in broilers (-0.99 ± 0.158; P < 0.0001) compared to turkeys (-0.57 ± 0.217; P = 0.011). However, improved FCR (-1.37 ± 0.345; P < 0.0001) was correlated with increased TD incidence. To conclude, this meta-analysis identified factors related to TD incidence and emphasized the need for tailored management strategies to mitigate impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207