MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416905418 · doi:10.1007/s00402-025-06145-8

Predictors of immobility following surgery for periprosthetic hip fractures

2025· article· en· W4416905418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher Lampert, Florian Pachmann, Kathrin Pfahl, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Tobias Helfen, Carl Neuerburg, Leon Faust

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriprostheticOrthopedic surgeryInternal fixationLogistic regressionRetrospective cohort studyComplicationCohortHip arthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are a growing clinical challenge, particularly in the elderly. Postoperative mobility is a key determinant of outcome, yet little is known about how surgical treatment and weight-bearing protocols influence functional recovery in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 186 patients aged ≥ 65 years treated surgically for Vancouver type B or C PPF between January 2017 and August 2023 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients underwent either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty. Postoperative weight-bearing protocols were categorized as full weight bearing (FWB) or partial weight bearing (PWB). The primary outcome was mobility status at hospital discharge. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for immobility. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients included (mean age 82.4 ± 7.4 years), 64.5% were mobilized with FWB. In the ORIF group, patients allowed FWB were significantly older (85.5 ± 7.4 vs. 80.2 ± 6.3 years, p < 0.001). No significant differences in mobility, complication rates, revision surgery, or in-hospital mortality were observed between weight-bearing regimens, regardless of the type of surgery. Logistic regression identified intraoperative blood transfusion (OR = 3.17) and higher ASA scores (ASA III: OR = 9.10; ASA IV: OR = 32.03) as independent predictors of postoperative immobility. Neither the postoperative weight-bearing protocol nor the surgical procedure had a significant impact on mobility outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study examines postoperative weight-bearing strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic hip fractures and simultaneously identifies independent risk factors associated with postoperative immobility. Our findings suggest that mobility outcomes are more influenced by patient-related factors than by surgical procedure. Our findings support the safe implementation of full weight-bearing protocols in elderly patients following periprosthetic femoral fractures, regardless of the type of surgical intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgerySame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207