MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416905747 · doi:10.1161/circep.124.013360

Fetal Bradycardia Prompting the Diagnosis and Management of Parental Long QT Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4416905747 on OpenAlexaff
Kiruthika Ananthan, Sian C. Chivers, Will Regan, Antonio de Marvao, Trisha V. Vigneswaran, Éric Rosenthal, Vita Zidere, Tessa Homfray, Catherine Williamson, John Simpson, Rachel Bastiaenen, John Whitaker

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLong QT syndromeBradycardiaQT intervalFetusElectrocardiographyGenetic testingPregnancyPostpartum period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is primarily an inherited condition associated with the risk of sudden cardiac death. Due to variable phenotypic expression, a prolonged QT interval on a 12-lead ECG is not always present. LQTS may present in the fetus with persistent bradycardia, including sinus bradycardia or functional 2:1 atrioventricular block. We report our experience of persistent fetal bradycardia prompting parental assessment for congenital LQTS. METHODS: From January 1, 2018 to November 1, 2023, 20 parents (20 mothers; 20 fathers) of fetuses presenting with persistent bradycardia and suspected congenital LQTS were assessed. Autoimmune-mediated atrioventricular block, diagnosed in the presence of maternal anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies, and fetuses with ventricular tachycardia were excluded. Parental ECGs were acquired in the remainder, with comprehensive evaluation, including genomic testing, performed in 12 mothers and 11 fathers. RESULTS: Among 20 fetuses, 16 had sinus bradycardia and 4 had 2:1 atrioventricular block (intermittent=2; persistent=2). Pathogenic LQTS genetic variants were found in 11 fetuses ( KCNQ1 =8; KCNE1 =1; KCNH2 =1; CALM2 [calmodulin 2]=1), 9 mothers ( KCNQ1 =7; KCNE1 =1; KCNH2 =1) and 1 father ( KCNQ1 =1). Maternal corrected QT interval was higher in those with pathogenic variants compared with those who did not undergo genomic testing (456.9±11.6 versus 425.9±28.7 ms, P =0.009) but <400 ms in the paternal carrier. After review, 5 mothers with pathogenic variants were commenced on β-blockers (prepartum=4; postpartum=1). Provocation testing with a treadmill exercise test led to the initiation of β-blockade postnatally in one further case. CONCLUSIONS: The first indication of parental LQTS may be persistent fetal bradycardia. This should prompt consideration of this diagnosis even with a normal maternal corrected QT interval and lead to the initiation of specific management strategies for pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period before the results of genomic testing are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Arrhythmia and ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207