Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein(a), and Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) reflect pro-inflammatory properties of Lp(a) (lipoprotein(a)). The effect of OxPL-apoB on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome in recent the era is not known. METHODS: OxPL-apoB levels and Lp(a) were measured in 11 630 participants before and 5185 participants 4 months after randomization to alirocumab or placebo in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline covariates evaluated associations between log 2 -transformed OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) with MACEs. Interactions between the 2 biomarkers and treatment were also evaluated. RESULTS: Participants were followed for a median 2.9 years; the median age was 58 years, and 23.9% were female. Alirocumab reduced median placebo-adjusted OxPL-apoB by 13.0% and Lp(a) by 26.2% (both P <0.0001). In the placebo group, a doubling of baseline OxPL-apoB was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.081 (95% CI, 1.026–1.139; P =0.0034) for MACEs. Addition of Lp(a) to the model relegated the relationship of OxPL-apoB insignificant. In the alirocumab group, neither OxPL-apoB nor Lp(a) remained significantly associated with MACEs. A significant 3-way interaction was present among continuous log 2 OxPL-apoB, Lp(a) stratified at the median, and treatment group on MACEs ( P interaction =0.0023) so that, in the placebo group, increasing OxPL-apoB was associated with higher risk of MACEs when Lp(a) was below the median concentration but not above. In the alirocumab group, OxPL-apoB was not related to MACE risk irrespective of Lp(a) concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome receiving optimized statin treatment, elevated OxPL-apoB levels predicted MACEs, a relationship abrogated by alirocumab. The interaction of OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) in the placebo group indicates that OxPL-apoB independently predicts MACEs when Lp(a) levels are relatively low. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT001747 and NCT01663402.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".