Contrary Dancing Bodymind: Impairment Elision and The Binaries of DD Dance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des cinquante dernières années, la danse adaptée a remis en question l’esthétique de la danse théâtrale normative occidentale. Si le travail des danseurs et danseuses en situation de handicap physique est bien documenté par la recherche et les écrits spécialisés sur la danse, celui des interprètes en situation de déficience intellectuelle (DI) n’a suscité que très peu d’intérêt, et sa contribution dans le domaine aux États-Unis passe inaperçue. Nous avançons que cette lacune est le résultat d’un effacement du handicap où, selon une hiérarchie de la déficience, les handicaps privilégiés en viennent à représenter toutes les expériences du handicap. Dans le cas de la danse adaptée, cet effacement est ancré dans l’hypothèse selon laquelle l’art requiert une intention, et que les danseurs et danseuses en situation de DI n’ont pas d’intention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".