MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416915547 · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-08347-9

What matters most to midwifery clients? Exploring continuity of care preferences through a cross-sectional survey in Ontario, Canada

2025· article· en· W4416915547 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Momina Khan, Meagan Furnivall, Julia Simioni, Beth Murray‐Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical CentreToronto Metropolitan University
FundersChildren's Health FoundationMcMaster University
KeywordsContinuity of careReproductive medicineElement (criminal law)MEDLINEQualitative researchMaternity care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care in midwifery is associated with improved outcomes for childbearing people and newborns. Despite its integration into the Ontario midwifery model, there is limited understanding of how clients perceive and value different aspects of continuity. This study aimed to explore midwifery clients' definitions, experiences, and perceptions of continuity to identify priorities and opportunities for refining midwifery care. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was part of a larger project examining continuity. Data were collected through an online survey administered via REDCap, with midwifery clients who gave birth in Ontario on or after January 1, 2018. The survey included quantitative and qualitative questions, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 514 participants completed the survey. 93% had a known midwife at their birth, and most received care from a team of 2-3 midwives. Regardless of number of midwives met and whether or not a known midwife attended the birth, respondents were highly satisfied with their midwifery care, particularly valuing communication, choice and continuity of carer. Having a known midwife was important during home births, emergencies, and postpartum care. Participants highlighted the multi-factorial nature of continuity involving not only a relationship based approach, but coordinated care and seamless information transfer. Trust and emotional safety were significantly enhanced by genuine relationships with midwives. Consistent communication and documentation were crucial in reducing anxiety and ensuring preparedness. CONCLUSION: Continuity of care is a foundational element of midwifery in Ontario, with clients highly valuing relational, management, and informational continuity. The study highlights the importance of trust, personalized care, and consistent communication in enhancing client satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthSame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207