Improvement on task performance and satisfaction with the use of dynamic arm support MOMO series on five users with upper limb dysfunction: A case series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamic arm support MOMO series by Reharo Corporation, Japan, is an upper limb orthosis that primarily supports the daily lives of people with impaired upper limb function. The MOMO series comprises two types: MOMO and MOMO Prime, which support horizontal movement and antigravity control of the upper limb, respectively. This case series describes occupational therapy interventions using the MOMO series and assistive devices tailored to the individual needs of five participants. Outcomes were assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the System Usability Scale (SUS). In all cases, COPM performance and satisfaction scores improved, indicating enhanced ability to engage in meaningful activities such as eating, smartphone use, and leisure. On the SUS score, higher satisfaction was observed when participants could apply the device independently and achieve tasks immediately after introduction. In several cases, the use of the MOMO series contributed to functional recovery, allowing tasks to be continued without the device. These findings suggest that the MOMO series can enhance independence, satisfaction, and quality of life when introduced with appropriate occupational therapy support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".