MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416919060 · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107280

Mechanical and microstructural characterization of the human tunica albuginea

2025· article· en· W4416919060 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pierre-Hugo Minster, C. Parat, P. Neuville, D. Carnicelli, N. Morel-Journel, Karine Bruyère-Garnier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1Agence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsTunica albuginea (penis)Characterization (materials science)Ultimate tensile strengthFiberProthesisAralditeTrichromeTunica

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tunica albuginea (TA) is a fibrous connective membrane surrounding the corpora cavernosa (CC), which plays a crucial role in the erection. In case of erectile dysfunction, inflatable penile prothesis (IPP) may be a treatment of choice and mechanical interactions occur between prostheses and these penile tissues. There is still much to be learned about their mechanical behavior to help to improve IPP and penile surgical techniques. This paper presents the characterization of the TA mechanical behavior combined with the observation of its microstructural organization, as well as the mechanical behavior of the cavernous tissue. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed on 40 TA samples and 17 CC samples collected from 5 post mortem human subjects. TA samples were cut along both longitudinal and circumferential directions, and in both proximal and distal regions. Histological slices were produced from biopsies contiguous to the samples to observe the collagen fiber organization in the TA. We observed that this fiber organization usually schematized by 2 layers of perpendicular fibers is more complex, with some dispersion in the fiber orientations and interlacing of the 2 layers. The mechanical characterization of the TA samples revealed no clear anisotropy but different properties for the proximal and distal locations, whereas the CC showed a very low elastic modulus. These data complement those already published and further analysis of the microstructure of the TA will be needed to explain the variability of the mechanical behavior of the TA in view of selecting and identifying nonlinear behavior models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207