MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416921582 · doi:10.1161/svi270000_414

Abstract 414: Association of atrophy, lacunes, and white matter hyperintensities with outcomes after thrombectomy: A Bayesian analysis

2025· article· en· W4416921582 on OpenAlexaff
Thiago Oscar Goulart, Markus D. Schirmer, A. K. Bonkhoff, E. L. Bogdanoff, P. Krieger, Brent Teasdale, A. S. Das, Adam A. Dmytriw, James D. Rabinov, Christopher J. Stapleton, Ankit Patel, Valeria Tutino, Michael Nahhas, Sunil A. Sheth, Claus Z. Simonsen, Robert W. Regenhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityOdds ratioLogistic regressionAtrophyStroke (engine)Intracerebral hemorrhageLeukoaraiosisOcclusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction/Purpose Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, including brain atrophy, lacunes, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH), are common in patients with ischemic stroke and may influence recovery after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Their independent association with post‐MT outcomes remains controversial. We sought to evaluate whether CSVD markers assessed on sensitive pre‐treatment MRI are associated with 90‐day poor outcomes (modified Rankin scale mRS 3‐6), post‐MT parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). Materials/Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter, multinational study of consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent MT and had pre‐treatment MRI. Brain atrophy was graded using the Pasquier scale, WMH using the Fazekas scale, and lacunes were rated as absent or present according to STRIVE‐2 criteria. The primary outcome was poor outcomes at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included ipsilateral PH and SICH during the acute hospitalization. Associations were assessed using multivariable Bayesian logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, baseline mRS, acute infarct volume, intravenous thrombolysis, symptom onset time, and mTICI 2b‐3 successful reperfusion. Results are presented as Bayesian odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) and posterior probabilities of association (Pr[OR>1]). Results Among 479 patients (median age 72 years [IQR, 59‐80]; 46% female; 50% received intravenous thrombolysis; 83% achieved successful reperfusion), lacunes were independently associated with poor outcomes (OR=1.87, 95%CrI=1.26‐3.10, Pr[OR>1]=0.99). Brain atrophy (OR=1.80, 95%CrI=1.00‐3.26, Pr[OR>1]=0.99) and moderate‐to‐severe WMH (OR=1.77, 95%CrI=1.01‐3.13, Pr[OR>1]=0.98) were also associated with higher probabilities of poor outcomes (Table 1). With regard to hemorrhagic transformation, WMH showed posterior probabilities suggestive of associations with PH (OR=1.83, 95%CrI=0.81‐4.17, Pr[OR>1]=0.93) and with SICH (OR=2.61, 95%CrI=0.72‐9.85, Pr[OR>1]=0.93). Atrophy (PH: OR=0.49, 95%CrI=0.21‐1.18, Pr[OR>1]=0.08; SICH: OR=0.81, 95%CrI=0.23‐3.02, Pr[OR>1]=0.38) and lacunes (PH: OR=0.95, 95%CrI=0.45‐1.71, Pr[OR>1]=0.45; SICH: OR=1.15, 95%CrI=0.34‐3.90, Pr[OR>1]=0.52) did not appear to be associated with PH or SICH, with posterior probabilities close to 0.5 and wide CrIs. Conclusion In a large dataset of patients with pre‐MT MRI, lacunes were independently associated with 90‐day poor outcomes; atrophy and WMH were also associated with high posterior probabilities of worse functional outcomes. Furthermore, WMH showed suggestive links to PH and SICH. These SVD markers are not contraindications to thrombectomy, but may refine prognostic stratification to guide clinical counseling and warrant further exploration in future studies to understand microvascular vulnerability of ischemic tissue. image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207