MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CycleGAN-Assisted Domain Adaptation for UAV Payload Detection

2025· article· W4416924119 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamid Azad, Miodrag Bolić, Iraj Mantegh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsDomain adaptationPayload (computing)Classifier (UML)Bridging (networking)Domain (mathematical analysis)Training setConsistency (knowledge bases)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) become increasingly integrated into various domains, concerns about their potential misuse have grown, highlighting topics such as reliable detection of carrying payloads. This paper presents a novel twostage deep learning framework for detecting loaded UAVs using vision-based classification. Due to the high cost of collecting realworld training data, we utilize a synthetic dataset for model training. However, domain shifts between synthetic and realworld data can degrade classification performance. To address this challenge, we employ a CycleGAN-based domain adaptation method that transforms real test samples into their synthetic counterparts, ensuring consistency with the training distribution. The adapted samples are then classified using a pre-trained deep network based on ResNet and EfficientNet architectures. By preserving the integrity of the classifier while bridging the domain gap, our approach significantly improves UAV payload detection. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing classification accuracy for real-world UAV monitoring applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207