MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416928481 · doi:10.2196/76644

Newly Designed Optical Coherence Tomography Catheter for Optimizing Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Protocol for a Feasibility Study

2025· article· en· W4416928481 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marinka J. Remmelink, Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen, Daniël M. de Bruin, Jorg R. Oddens

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyProtocol (science)Bladder cancerCatheterComputed tomographyTomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer diagnosis relies on cystoscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for histopathological evaluation, but this process is time consuming, costly, and subject to variability. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers real-time, high-resolution imaging as a potential alternative. OBJECTIVE: This study primarily aims to assess the feasibility of capturing in vivo cross-sectional images of the bladder wall using a novel microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)-based OCT catheter. Secondary objectives include evaluating measurement duration, assessing tumor stage and grade from OCT images in comparison with histopathology, determining the catheter's ability to image resection beds, and comparing OCT-based tumor staging with white light cystoscopy assessments. METHODS: This single-center feasibility study at Amsterdam University Medical Center includes patients undergoing TURBT for suspected bladder tumors. Eligible patients must be aged 18 years or older, have at least 1 cystoscopically accessible tumor, and must be physically fit for TURBT. Exclusion criteria include pregnancy, tumors larger than 2 cm, more than 5 tumors, isolated flat lesions, or tumors solely at the bladder neck. The primary end point assesses the procedural feasibility of OCT imaging, while the secondary end points evaluate tumor staging, grading, and correlation with histopathology. Up to 25 patients will be enrolled, with feasibility achieved if diagnostic images are obtained in more than 60% of the cases. OCT imaging is performed before and after tumor resection, with histopathological results used for comparison. Patients will be monitored for adverse events for 4 weeks after the procedure, after which study participation ends. RESULTS: As of November 2025, 16 participants have been enrolled, and 13 have successfully completed the study procedure. The projected end date of the study is November 2025, and results are expected to be published in March 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study is expected to provide key insights into the feasibility and clinical utility of the newly developed MEMS-based forward-looking OCT system for real-time bladder imaging during TURBT. This study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in staging and grading bladder cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06679920; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06679920. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/76644.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207