MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416935740 · doi:10.4103/jihs.jihs_70_25

Factors Associated with Balance Confidence in Middle-aged People with Osteoarthritis Knee: An Observational Study

2025· article· en· W4416935740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megha Sheth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrated Health Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACConfidence intervalBalance (ability)Observational studyOsteoarthritisBody mass indexRehabilitationBalance problemsOutpatient clinic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Balance confidence plays a vital role in determining functional independence and fall risk in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Understanding the factors associated with balance confidence in middle-aged individuals with KOA is essential for developing targeted rehabilitation strategies. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the association between balance confidence and clinical variables such as pain-related disability, functional reach, lower limb strength, and physical activity in middle-aged individuals with KOA. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included 65 participants (aged 40–65 years) with clinically diagnosed KOA, recruited from a tertiary care physiotherapy outpatient department. Balance confidence was measured using the activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale–Gujarati (ABC-G). Clinical variables included pain and functional disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]), dynamic balance (functional reach test, [FRT]), lower limb strength (five times sit-to-stand test, [5TSTS]), and physical activity (IPAQ-SF-SF). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of balance confidence. Results: The multiple linear regression showed that WOMAC and FRT scores predicted the balance confidence in patients with KOA. Specifically, higher WOMAC scores were associated with lower ABC-G scores ( B = −0.457, P = 0.021), indicating that greater disability correlates with decreased balance confidence. Conversely, FRT scores were strongly linked to ABC-G ( B = 2.180, P < 0.001), highlighting the importance of dynamic balance. IPAQ-SF and 5TSTS scores were not significantly related to ABC-G ( P = 0.087 and P = 0.083), respectively. Body mass index (BMI) also demonstrated a negative but nonsignificant association with ABC-G ( B = −0.482, P = 0.160), suggesting that higher BMI may reduce confidence in balance but does not independently predict it. Conclusion: Pain-related disability and impaired dynamic balance significantly predict reduced balance confidence in middle-aged individuals with KOA. Targeted rehabilitation focusing on pain control and postural stability may enhance confidence and reduce the risk of falls in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrated Health Sciences→Same topicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention→French-language works237,207→