CoDeF: A web-based education platform for system-level design of unmanned vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the demand for unmanned vehicle (UV) systems continues to grow across a wide range of industries, there is an increasing need for professionals equipped to carry out mission-specific, system-level design. However, traditional engineering education often lacks structured methods for system-level design and does not provide adequate environments for hands-on, collaborative design experiences. To address this gap, we present the Comprehensive Design Framework for Advanced Mobility (CoDeF)—a web-based collaborative platform tailored for early-stage UV system design and education. Built on systems engineering principles, CoDeF provides a structured design process and supports synchronized collaboration among multiple users through shared data and workflows. The platform offers high extensibility and configurability, allowing instructors to flexibly modify design stages and deliverables to meet specific educational objectives. CoDeF has been successfully implemented in multiple university courses, demonstrating its potential as a practical tool for bridging the gap between academic training and industry-oriented system design practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it