MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416944470 · doi:10.3390/nu17233784

Polyphenol-Microbiota Interactions in Atherosclerosis: The Role of Hydroxytyrosol and Tyrosol in Modulating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

2025· review· en· W4416944470 on OpenAlexafffund
Mojgan Morvaridzadeh, Mehdi Alami, Hicham Berrougui, Kaoutar Boumezough, Hawa Sidibé, Ikram Salih, Khalid Sadki, Abdelouahed Khalil

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrients · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHydroxytyrosolTyrosolOxidative stressInflammationGut floraContext (archaeology)CardioprotectionImmune systemDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory cardiovascular disease that may result from the interaction between oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, and metabolic disorders. Recent studies indicate that the well-known phenolic compounds, hydroxytyrosol (HTyr) and tyrosol (Tyr) present in extra virgin olive oil, confer cardioprotection through various mechanisms of action that include antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and metabolic regulatory properties. The gut microbiota modulates the structure, bioavailability, and bioactivity of these phenolic compounds, thereby influencing their therapeutic potential. This review explores the intricate interactions between Tyr, HTyr, and gut microbiota within the context of atherosclerosis prevention and management. We explore how gut microbial metabolism can magnify or alter the biological effects of the Tyr and HTyr, and how interindividual differences in microbiota composition may influence their efficacy. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms could support the development of precision nutrition strategies aimed at reducing the risk of atherosclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrientsSame topicEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207