MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416949964 · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06593-2

Advancing integration in the approach to older adults with HIV: perspectives from geriatric and HIV specialists

2025· article· en· W4416949964 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carmen Pérez Cano, Miguel Suárez-Robles, Pablo Ryan, Virgilio Hernández‐Ruiz, Giovanni Guaraldi, Julian Falutz, Santiago Moreno, Matilde Sánchez‐Conde, Fátima Brañas

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Geriatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeriatricsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Psychological interventionRehabilitationAmbiguityMEDLINEGeriatric careGeriatric rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The aging of people with HIV (PWH) is a growing public health concern, with projections indicating that by 2030, up to 70% of this population will be aged 50 years or older. Despite the increasing prevalence of age-related comorbidities and geriatric syndromes in older adults with HIV (OAWH), the integration of geriatric expertise into HIV care remains limited. This study aimed to assess geriatricians' knowledge and involvement in the care of OAWH and to explore HIV specialists' attitudes toward collaborative, multidisciplinary care. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted using two structured online surveys-one for geriatricians and one for HIV specialists-disseminated through national scientific societies in Spain, Italy, Mexico, and Canada. The surveys assessed clinical experience, knowledge, and attitudes toward OAWH care, and were developed by experts with over 15 years of clinical experience. Data were collected anonymously via the REDCap platform and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 348 responses were received: 200 from geriatricians and 148 from HIV specialists. Among geriatricians, 42% correctly identified the age threshold for OAWH, and 73% reported seeing one or no OAWH in the previous year. Furthermore, 92.5% indicated a need for further training. HIV specialists largely recognized the importance of adapting care for OAWH, with 91.2% acknowledging frailty as clinically relevant. However, only 38% routinely performed frailty screening. Both groups expressed support for increased collaboration, though only around half believed that geriatricians should be systematically involved in OAWH care. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights significant gaps in knowledge, training, and interdisciplinary collaboration in the care of OAWH. While both geriatricians and HIV specialists recognize the unique needs of this population, barriers such as insufficient training and role ambiguity hinder progress. Our findings support earlier, biologically informed interventions and integration of geriatrics into routine HIV care; targeted training and institutional support appear warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GeriatricsSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207