Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article yokes family stories about Robert Burns as a literary, cultural, and amicable influence upon the Bishop and Cleghorn families. It delves into Burns’s Scotland as lived with the article author’s ancestor Robert Cleghorn; they shared verses, sung and dined together, and exchanged letters about poetry and farming in Edinburgh and Dumfries. The Cleghorn and Bishop families brought Burns’s poetic culture to Canada. Elizabeth Bishop’s grandfather, William “Pa” Bulmer, read Burns and the Bible in the Great Village family parlor during evenings, and Bishop inherited stories of Burns being read during the Maritime seafaring adventures of William Hutchinson, the brother of her grandmother “Gammie.” Bishop’s childhood absorption of Burns influenced her oft-expressed wanderlust, her use of ballad forms, and her unflinching inclusion of abjection in poetry. Bishop’s Bulmer family hailed from Yorkshire and sailed to Nova Scotia in the 1740s. Bulmer/Boomer migrations to Canada continued in the early 1800s, including the author’s Boomer ancestors, Michael and his daughter Mary Boomer, who married my great-great-grandfather Andrew Cleghorn. Boomer genealogy from the Bulmer and surrounding villages in Yorkshire extends back to the clan’s historical roots as Huguenots in France exiled by Louis XIV. These 500-year-old circuits reveal diasporic culture at work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it