MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416956232 · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101248

FAME-CRISPR improves CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing via HDAC inhibition and engineered virus-like particle delivery

2025· article· en· W4416956232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
KeywordsGenome editingHistone deacetylaseCRISPRPopulationTransduction (biophysics)HDAC1GeneHDAC6Selection (genetic algorithm)Histone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CRISPR-mediated gene editing using engineered virus-like particles (eVLPs) can achieve high efficiency, but performance varies with reduced effectiveness often seen in primary cells or when generating polyclonal models at scale. We developed a faster, accurate and 4-fold more efficient CRISPR-Cas9 (FAME-CRISPR) method using pan-histone deacetylase inhibitors with eVLP transduction compared to previous reports using other histone deacetylase inhibitors. Combined optimization of pan-HDACi treatment with eVLP enhanced double-strand break (DSB)-mediated CRISPR and base editing gave significantly edited populations within 2- to 3-cell mean population doublings, reducing the need for post-editing selection in immortalized cancer cells and in primary diploid fibroblasts that have limited replicative lifespans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it