MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hardware-Accelerated Pedestrian Detection and Low-Latency Video Streaming for Drone Applications

2025· article· W4416963043 on OpenAlexaff
Hengming Liu, Jiaxuan Li, Yujie Wu, Huafeng Li, Ke Xiao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrian detectionDroneObject detectionBenchmark (surveying)PedestrianPipeline (software)Software deploymentVideo trackingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing deployment of drones in public security and surveillance necessitates real-time, efficient aerial pedestrian detection and low-latency video transmission technologies. In this work, we present a real-time, hardwareaccelerated system for aerial pedestrian detection and lowlatency video streaming, specifically designed for resourceconstrained edge devices. To address the challenges of aerialview person recognition, we augment an existing person reidentification benchmark with dense urban imagery and diverse image transformations, and subsequently enhance a popular object detection framework by training it on this combined dataset. The optimized model is converted to a standard format, further optimized for efficiency, and deployed onto a specialized chip integrating a multi-core processor, AI accelerator, and graphics engine. Through hardware-aware optimizations, the model size is significantly reduced with minimal accuracy loss, enabling real-time processing and efficient video encoding. Additionally, we develop a streaming pipeline incorporating adaptive techniques to ensure robust performance under fluctuating network conditions, achieving ultra-low latency. Experimental results demonstrate that our system outperforms several existing methods in accuracy, inference speed, and resource utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207