MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416965488 · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000859

Tenofovir alafenamide for prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative, anti–HBc-positive patients undergoing rituximab-based chemotherapy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4416965488 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar Taba Taba Vakili, Grishma Hirode, Muhammad Atif Zahoor, Ahreni Saunthar, Joshua B. Feld, Bettina E. Hansen, Ambreen Syeda, Harry L.A. Janssen, Vishal Kukreti, John Kuruvilla, Anca Prica, Matthew C. Cheung, Rena Buckstein, Lisa K. Hicks, Carla S. Coffin, Lesley Street, Patricia Disperati, Kelvin Chan, Michael Crump, Jordan J. Feld

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySt. Michael's HospitalToronto East General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoToronto Liver CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTenofovir alafenamideRandomized controlled trialHBsAgHepatitis BHepatitis B virusHBeAg

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunosuppression can cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, leading to severe outcomes in patients with "resolved" HBV infection. This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy of preemptive antiviral therapy in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive patients receiving rituximab-based chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/placebo across 3 phases: chemotherapy plus TAF/placebo (phase 1), TAF/placebo post-chemotherapy (phase 2), and follow-up after therapy cessation (phase 3). The primary endpoint was HBsAg reverse seroconversion. HBsAg and ALT were monitored every 3-12 weeks, depending on treatment phase, and HBV DNA was measured post hoc. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02186574). RESULTS: Among 42 patients (median age 65.2 years, 52.4% male, 52.4% aggressive lymphoma, 73.8% anti-HBs positive), 20 received TAF and 22 received a placebo. Median ALT was 20.0 U/L (IQR: 15.0-28.0) at baseline. Median follow-up was 69.4 weeks (IQR: 63.7-166), with 6.1 weeks (IQR: 4.7-8.3) between visits. During follow-up, 2 patients in the TAF arm, but none receiving placebo, experienced HBsAg reverse seroconversions: occurring in phase 3 at 62.3 weeks from baseline, and in phase 1 at 20.0 weeks from baseline. Neither patient experienced ALT >2× ULN. HBV DNA >1000 IU/mL was observed in 8 instances among 6 patients, 3 in each arm, with no associated hepatitis. Low-level DNA (<1000 IU/mL) was not indicative of reverse seroconversion, DNA increases, or ALT elevations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of preemptive TAF therapy did not reduce the risk of HBsAg reverse seroconversion; however, the findings should be interpreted with caution as the study was underpowered due to slow enrolment leading to early termination. Low-level HBV DNA elevations were not associated with HBV reactivation. Thus, close HBsAg and ALT monitoring are adequate in HBsAg-negative patients undergoing rituximab-based chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatology CommunicationsSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207