MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416972678 · doi:10.62713/aic.3871

Using Implantable Artificial Dermis-PELNAC as a Functional Material to Guide Reconstruction of Finger Body Defect

2025· article· en· W4416972678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hu Yang, Weijie Zhou, Yanzhao Dong, Haiying Zhou, Ahmad Alhaskawi, Wei Shen, Sohaib Hasan Abdullah Ezzi, Vishnu Goutham Kota, Mohamed Hasan Abdulla Hasan Abdulla, Siyi Chen, Wen Feng, Zhenyu Sun, Olga Alenikova, Sahar Ahmed Abdalbary, Hui Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnali Italiani di Chirurgia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinger jointJoint (building)Skin transplantationArtificial skin3d printed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: Managing partial defects of the finger is crucial for both function and aesthetics, especially when bone or tendon is exposed. Permacol Enhanced Layer for Neodermis and Coverage (PELNAC), an artificial dermis, serves as a promising scaffold in surgical procedures, providing wound protection and promoting tissue healing. This study assesses the effectiveness of PELNAC in treating a range of partial finger defects. METHODS: We assessed PELNAC's morphology and microstructure using scanning electron microscopy, characterized its degradation profile over six weeks in simulated body fluid, and confirmed its cytocompatibility with L929 cell cultures. In the clinical setting, 47 patients with 56 partial finger defects (both superficial and deep) were treated using PELNAC alone. Outcome measures included wound closure time, range of motion (ROM), sensory recovery (two-point discrimination), Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy revealed interconnected micropores in PELNAC, with a porosity of 81.3 ± 2.1% and aperture sizes of 40-70 µm (top view) and 60-100 µm (section view). After six weeks in simulated body fluid, PELNAC retained 86.4 ± 1.5% of its weight, and cells proliferated well on its surface. All treated wounds healed without the need for split-thickness skin grafts, with an average closure time of 58.7 ± 12.8 days (range: 30-84 days). Age showed weak positive correlation with healing time (r = 0.152, p < 0.01) and weak negative correlation with two-point discrimination (r = -0.55, p < 0.01). Longer healing times correlated with reduced ROM (r = -0.143, p < 0.01), while higher VSS scores were linked to poorer functional outcomes (r = -0.22, p < 0.01). The average ROM in patients with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) defects was 49° (IQR: 45-56.25°). Sensory recovery averaged 5.95 mm (IQR: 5.175-6.7 mm). The mean VSS score was 2 (IQR: 1-3), indicating minimal scarring. Patient satisfaction was high (functional score: 9 (IQR: 8-9.25)), with no severe complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates the clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of PELNAC as a single-stage reconstructive material for partial finger defects. PELNAC facilitates wound healing without secondary skin grafts, preserving joint mobility, promoting sensory recovery, and minimizing scarring. The results highlight PELNAC as a simple, safe, and effective alternative to traditional approaches, reducing donor site morbidity and eliminating the need for multiple surgeries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnali Italiani di ChirurgiaSame topicReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207