MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416996424 · doi:10.1139/facets-2025-0052

Manganese ore systems: a Canadian perspective on a critical element in the transition to a sustainable green economy within North America

2025· article· en· W4416996424 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
N Rogers, Edward J. Matheson, Peir K. Pufahl, Bryan Way

Bibliographic record

VenueFACETS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityCape Breton UniversityGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManganeseElement (criminal law)Production (economics)Lead (geology)TonnageMineral resource classificationPrecious metalComponent (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manganese is a critical metal for modern economic development. Over 85% of manganese is used in the production of steel, where, as a desulphurizing agent, it is an essential additive in all steelmaking, and as an alloying agent it makes a range of specialty steels. Additionally, it has significant uses in fertilizer, animal feed, rubber, glass, unleaded gasoline, ceramics, and paints. Currently over 80% of manganese ore comes from a few mines in Africa and Australia, but its production is facing two potential paradigm shifting developments over the next decade: the potential extraction of manganese nodules from the ocean floor; and within the transition to a green economy as a component for electric vehicle batteries. Herein we present the first national inventory of Canada’s manganese occurrences in 90 years. While Canada has no current production, it does contain many occurrences, though most are too small to be viable operations. Presently, the deposits most suitable for mining are in the Woodstock area, New Brunswick. Not only are these relatively large tonnage and high grade, but their mineral composition also makes them more suitable for electric vehicle batteries than most currently mined manganese ore or, potentially in the future, from seafloor mining of manganese nodules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFACETSSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207