MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416998010 · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2025.11.013

Bladder Cancer Burden in the USA: Population Scenarios for 2040

2025· article· en· W4416998010 on OpenAlex
Hawre Jalal, Stella K. Kang, Fernando Alarid‐Escudero, Stavroula A. Chrysanthopoulou, David U. Garibay-Treviño, Bruce L. Jacobs, Karen M. Kuntz, Praveen Kumar, Jonah Popp, Yuliia Sereda, Mutita Siriruchatanon, John B. Wong, Thomas A Trikalinos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
KeywordsBladder cancerIncidence (geometry)PopulationDiseaseCancerDisease burdenBurden of disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: Bladder cancer is the sixth most common cancer among men and is expensive to manage. We independently developed three microsimulation models that describe its natural history and explain epidemiological trends. We projected bladder cancer burden in the USA through 2040 to inform workforce planning. Methods: We calibrated the models to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program incidence data and standardized key inputs. For White men, the highest-incidence subgroup, the models inferred unobservable epidemiological metrics, including lifetime risks by birth cohort and ages of the key events in the natural history. We simulated individual life histories under calibrated parameter sets and summarized the outcomes as yearly rates and counts. Key findings and limitations: Each model's predictions reproduced SEER age- and stage-specific incidence data. Across models, the lifetime risk of bladder cancer grew from approximately 1.5-2.4% in the 1910 to 3.1-4.4% in the 2010 birth cohorts, consistent with longevity and smoking exposure patterns. Of the cancer cases, 75% instantiate after ages 61-64 yr. The median model durations from when a cancer is screen detectable to its clinical manifestation were 2.1-3.3 yr, with a wide range across individuals. Through 2040, the incidence standardized to the 2000 US population declined by 0.4-0.6%/yr (consistent with the declining smoking rates, the most important environmental risk factor), but the annual incidence and new cases increased by 1.5-1.8%/yr (because the baby boomer population is living longer). Modeling supplements incomplete data with assumptions, but similar findings across independent models suggest some robustness to assumptions. Conclusions and clinical implications: Projected cohort longevity and smoking patterns imply an increased disease burden in the future, which may benefit from commensurate increased research and resources. From the inferred natural history, we speculate a theoretical opportunity for screening, which should be investigated with dedicated modeling and empirical studies. Patient summary: Three computer simulation models predicted the future incidence of bladder cancer burden in White men, in whom this cancer is most common. The models found that although the future incidence of bladder cancer would decrease slightly over time (consistent with the declining smoking rates, the most important environmental risk factor), the overall disease burden increased because the baby boomer population is living longer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it