<i>EGFLAM</i> Pathogenic Variants and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous inherited retinal disorder (IRD), and in many complete CSNB (cCSNB) cases, the underlying genetic cause remains unknown. Uncovering the genetic defects of IRDs helps to refine diagnostic methods and supports the development of specific therapeutic approaches. Objective: To describe the phenotype and the underlying gene defect in patients with cCSNB from 2 unrelated families. Design, Setting and Participants: This retrospective case series was conducted from January 2023 to July 2025. Data for 3 patients from cohorts of genetically unsolved IRD cases in France (n = 140 for CSNB) and the Netherlands (n = 2730 for IRD) were analyzed clinically and genetically. Exposures: Complete ocular examination, including multimodal retinal imaging and full-field electroretinography (ffERG) incorporating the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards and multimodal retinal imaging, were performed. Gene defects were identified by genome sequencing (GS) and exome sequencing (ES). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was a gene defect, EGFLAM, underlying cCSNB. Measures included phenotyping, GS, ES, Sanger sequencing, and cosegregation analysis. Results: The series included 3 patients from 2 unrelated families of Moroccan ancestry showing high myopia, reduced visual acuity, and night blindness. Retinal imaging depicted myopic changes. ffERG revealed electronegative Schubert-Bornschein configuration in keeping with cCSNB with ON-bipolar cell dysfunction. Patients were lacking pathogenic variants in known genes implicated in IRDs, including CSNB. Two different homozygous pathogenic variants, c.1563_1566del, p.(Val522Glufs*18) and c.1795C>T, p.(Arg599*) in EGFLAM were identified by ES and GS. The corresponding protein is localized in the outer plexiform layer and important for ON-bipolar cell signaling in the retina. Conclusion and Relevance: This case series reports on a gene defect in EGFLAM implicated in human cCSNB. Clinicians should be aware about this association and consider including EGFLAM in diagnostic gene panels for IRDs. This discovery may lead to faster and more accurate diagnosis of cCSNB and genetic counseling, as well as a pathway for developing therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".