Assessing the Association Between Meeting New 24‐h Movement Guidelines and Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Among Chinese Medical Students: A Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the associations between meeting the new Canadian 24‐h movement guidelines and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among Chinese medical students, thus providing empirical and theoretical support for targeted mental health interventions. Methods A total of 3679 medical students were recruited through multicenter convenience sampling in November 2022. A self‐administered standardized questionnaire assessed three 24‐h movement behaviors—moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary time, and sleep—as well as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Logistic regression models were applied to analyze the association between meeting new 24‐h movement guidelines and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Results A total of 3228 valid responses were obtained. The proportions of students who met all 24‐h movement behavior recommendations were low, at 4.01% among clinical students and 7.14% among nursing students. The overall prevalence of negative emotional symptoms was 60.9% in clinical students and 46.7% in nursing students. A clear dose–response relationship was evident between the number of recommendations met and a lower risk of depression, anxiety, and stress. Medical students who fully met all recommendations had a significantly lower risk of negative emotional symptoms compared with those who met none (stress odds ratio [OR] = 0.239, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.101–0.568, p = 0.001; anxiety OR = 0.601, 95% CI: 0.407–0.889, p = 0.011; depression OR = 0.450, 95% CI: 0.290–0.700, p < 0.001). Similar protective associations were found in both clinical and nursing subgroups. All associations remained generally consistent after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, supporting the robustness of the results. A significant three‐way interaction among MVPA, sedentary behavior, and sleep was observed for stress. Conclusion Adherence to the 24‐h movement behavior recommendations was suboptimal among Chinese medical students. However, greater adherence was associated with a lower risk of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, highlighting the need for integrated lifestyle interventions targeting physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep balance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".