MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417000272 · doi:10.34302/2025.17.3.14

FUTURE FOODS DEVELOPMENT: EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE, FEEDMOISTURE AND COCONUT ADDITION ON THE PHYSICOCHEMICALPROPERTIES OF EXTRUDED CORN SNACKS

2025· article· en· W4417000272 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCarpathian Journal of Food Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoconut Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMoistureWater contentFood processingExtrusion cooking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study investigated the effect of temperature, feed moisture and coconut addition on the physicochemical properties of extruded corn snacks.The samples processed and data collected analyzed using standard methods.The results findings revealed that there were significant variations (P<0.05) in the proximate composition of the extruded corn-coconut snack samples.The ash, moisture, fire and fat contents ranged from 3.54-3.82%,4.94-5.60%,2.87-3.15%and 8.90-9.15%,respectively.The protein content of the extruded snack samples varied from 9.93 to 12.31%, while the carbohydrate content ranged from 66.36 to 69.40%.Carbohydrate content was highest in FGH (69.40%) and lowest in BCO (66.36%).The moderate fat content can aid in the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (ADEK).Significant differences (p<0.05) were also observed in some of the functional properties of the extruded corn-coconut snacks with the emulsion stability ranging from 10.00 to 11.33%, while emulsion activity ranged from 9.14 to 9.91%.The oil absorption capacity, bulk density and foaming capacity ranged from 1.93-2.98%,0.57-0.76%and 11.17-15.60%,respectively.Oil absorption capacity varied significantly, with NPO and BCO samples exhibiting the highest values (2.98 g/g), reflecting their potential for flavor retention and mouthfeel enhancement.Bulk density ranged from 0.57 to 0.76 g/cm³, where higher values (e.g., QRW and YXZ) imply denser products, potentially influencing packaging and textural properties.Foaming capacity varied between 11.17% and 15.60%, with NPO demonstrating the most pronounced ability to entrap air, which is crucial for snack lightness and volume.The colour and physical properties of the extruded snacks also varied significantly (p<0.05)among the samples.The results of the sensory evaluation revealed that the sample VST was ranked the highest in terms of overall acceptability, while sample SOA was ranked least.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarpathian Journal of Food Science and TechnologySame topicCoconut Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207