MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417000468 · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.12.002

Prevalence of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4417000468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teodor Serban, Tatjana Müller, Sven Knecht, Qurrat‐ul‐ain Abid, Henry D. Huang, Behnam Subin, Fabian Jordan, Philipp Krisai, Felix Mahfoud, Michael Kühne, Christian Sticherling, Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz, Patrick Badertscher

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen WissenschaftenUniversität Basel
KeywordsEtiologyMEDLINEEpidemiologySystematic reviewAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM) is a reversible cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) that arises from sustained cardiac arrhythmias. Despite its clinical significance, AiCM has traditionally been considered a rare entity, and its prevalence remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of AiCM across various patient populations, assess the impact of baseline characteristics on AiCM development, and critically evaluate the diagnostic criteria used in clinical studies. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with searches performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, and quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions version 2. Meta-regression was used to analyze the factors influencing AiCM prevalence. RESULTS: From 1149 abstracts, 26 studies involving 7331 patients (mean age 58 years; 26% women; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 46%) were included. The overall prevalence of AiCM was 8%, with a significantly higher prevalence (59%) observed in cohorts of patients with LVSD. AiCM prevalence varied across studies depending on the type of arrhythmia and the diagnostic criteria applied. Multivariable meta-regression identified significant associations between AiCM prevalence and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.90-0.98; P = .002) and patient age (odds ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.30; P = .03). Patients with AiCM had consistently higher baseline heart rates than control groups (standardized mean difference random effects model 0.35 [0.09-0.61]; P = .01). CONCLUSION: AiCM is the most frequent etiology of LVSD in patients with arrhythmias. These findings highlight the need for standardized diagnostic criteria to ensure appropriate management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.043
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeart RhythmSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207