MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417002646 · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2025.3639954

Dual-Channel Learning Framework for miRNA-Drug Interaction Prediction Based on Structural Features and Signed Bipartite Graph Neural Network

2025· article· W4417002646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Big Data · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesShaanxi Normal UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBipartite graphGraph isomorphismGraphArtificial neural networkBiological networkConvolutional neural networkComplex networkMatching (statistics)Sequence (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a vital role in regulating a wide range of biological functions and are key players in the development of many complex human diseases, making them novel therapeutic targets for drug development. Given the high expenses and time demands of traditional experimental methods, it is essential to develop efficient computational approaches for predicting miRNA-drug interactions (MDIs). This article presents a dual-channel learning framework, SSMDI, based on structural features and Signed Bipartite Graph Neural Network (SBGNN) for predicting MDIs. Firstly, Graph Isomorphism Networks (GIN) is employed to extract molecular graph features of drugs. Meanwhile, a combined framework of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) network and Self-attention Mechanism is utilized to capture sequence features of miRNAs. Compared with traditional networks, signed networks can deliver richer semantic information in drugs and miRNAs. Therefore, SBGNN is then used to aggregate and update the signed topological features of miRNAs and drugs. Finally, structural and signed topological features are integrated to predict MDIs. The predictive performance of the model is evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation (CV), achieving AUC of 0.9447 and AUPR of 0.9238. The case study further demonstrates the effectiveness of SSMDI in predicting MDIs. In summary, the SSMDI model proves to be an accurate tool for predicting MDIs, which holds significant implications for drug development and miRNA-based therapeutic research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it