MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417002922 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3069

Perioperative use of efanesoctocog alfa in Hemophilia A: A dual-center real-world study

2025· article· en· W4417002922 on OpenAlexaff
Kadhim Al-Banaa, Doris Quon, Ellen Cusano, Annette von Drygalski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperativeHemostasisDosingFactor IXVon Willebrand diseaseClinical trialVon Willebrand factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Persons with Hemophilia A (PWH) are at high risk of bleeding during and after surgery. Standard perioperative management requires frequent factor VIII infusions to maintain hemostatic levels, which is burdensome. Efanesoctocog alfa (ALTUVIIIO®) is a first-in-class, ultra–extended half-life FVIII concentrate that received FDA approval in 2023 for routine prophylaxis and perioperative bleeding management. It is engineered as a B-domain–deleted recombinant FVIII protein fused to the Fc domain of human IgG1, the D′D3 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), and XTEN® polypeptides. This design enables independence from the VWF half-life ceiling, prolonging circulation time and affording higher sustained FVIII activity. Clinical trials demonstrated excellent surgical hemostasis with Efanesoctocog alfa, but real-world perioperative outcomes data with larger numbers of subjects remain limited. We therefore sought to explore perioperative hemostasis properties in the real-world setting to evaluate dosing, administration frequency, hemostatic effectiveness and safety of perioperative Eefanesoctocog alfa administration in adult PWH. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all surgeries performed between March 1, 2023, and June 30, 2025 at two Hemophilia Treatment Centers in the United States (University of San Diego California and Orthopaedic Center Los Angeles). Surgical procedures were classified per ISTH criteria as major or minor. Inclusion criteria included PWH > age 18, who received at least one preoperative dose of Efanesoctocog alfa, plus/minus additional postoperative doses administered at the discretion of treating physicians. Patients with active factor VIII inhibitors were excluded. Data collected included demographics, hemophilia severity, prior prophylaxis, dosing and frequency of Efanesoctocog alfa, perioperative antifibrinolytic use, bleeding outcomes, rescue factor therapy, transfusion requirements, complications, and bleeding events within 30 days postoperatively. Results: Fifty-eight surgeries were performed in 48 patients. The median age was 43 years (IQR 38–60); 52 of 58 surgeries (90%) were in male patients. Severe, moderate and mild hemophilia A was present in 26 (48%), 3 (5%) and 26 cases (48%), respectively (data missing in 3 cases). Twenty-five (47%) procedures were classified as major and 28 (53%) as minor, respectively. Intraoperative hemostasis was achieved in all cases. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 6 surgeries (10%), but was all minor (wound oozing, hematuria, mucosal) and could be managed conservatively. Rescue factor therapy with standard half-life rFVIII was used in 4 cases (7%). One patient (1.7%) required red blood cell transfusion. Antifibrinolytic therapy was used in 37 of 58 surgeries (64%). Of those, 17 cases (46%) received intravenous antifibrinolytics as part of the standard surgical protocol, 12 cases (32%) received oral antifibrinolytics as adjuvant therapy, and 8 cases (22%) received both IV and oral routes. No thromboembolic events were observed. A second postoperative dose of Efanesoctocog alfa was administered in 20 surgeries (35%), most commonly on postoperative day 3 or 4. Median hospital length of stay was 2 days for major surgeries and 0 days for minor procedures. Four patients (7%) experienced minor bleeding within 30 days postoperatively, including 3 with nonsurgical-site bleeding (e.g., spontaneous mucosal or muscle bleeds) and 1 with expected residual bleeding following a prostate biopsy. No patient experienced unexpected bleeding from the surgical site, or developed venous thromboembolism Conclusions: Perioperative Efanesoctocog alfa administration provided effective surgical hemostasis, whereby a single preoperative outpatient dose was sufficient for most procedures. These observations are encouraging since Efanesoctocog alfa seems to not only facilitate but also alleviate outpatient management, advantageous to reduce management burden for patients and health care staff alike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→