MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417006732 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-305

Emicizumab prophylaxis in pups and mtps with severe haemophilia: The pednet real world experience in 80 infants

2025· article· en· W4417006732 on OpenAlexaff
Marloes de Kovel, Gili Kenet, Jayashree Motwani, Nadine G. Andersson, Jan Blanty, Giancarlo Castaman, Manuel Carção, Carmen Escuriola-Ettingshausen, Chris Königs, Christoph Male, Beatrice Nolan, Martin Olivieri, Caroline Oudot, Helen Pergantou, Susanna Ranta, Ester Zápotocká, Kathelijn Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcomitantHaemophilia AAdverse effectObservational studyHaemophiliaClinical endpointClinical trialIncidence (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Emicizumab (Hemlibra®, Roche) is a humanized bispecific antibody used for subcutaneous prophylaxis in children of any age and adults with haemophilia A (HA). While the HAVEN-7 trial provided primary data on 55 infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors, real-world data regarding this age group remains limited. To address this, we analysed prospectively collected data on inhibitor development and bleeding in emicizumab-treated previously untreated patients (PUPs) and minimally treated patients (MTPs; i.e. <6 exposure days (EDs) to FVIII) at PedNet Centres. Data were extracted from the PedNet Registry (a prospective, observational multicentre study collecting data from 34 haemophilia treatment centres in 19 countries), as of January 1, 2025, focusing on children with severe HA without inhibitors who started emicizumab as either PUPs or MTPs, and had received emicizumab prophylaxis for ≥12 weeks. Children included in the HAVEN-7 trial were excluded. Ethical approval was obtained from the parents/guardians of all participants. Key endpoints were inhibitor development, and bleeding rates, including the proportion of children with zero treated bleeds. We analysed 80 infants (39/80 were PUP) with a median follow-up of 84.5 weeks and a median age at emicizumab initiation of 8.6 months (P25-P75 6.7-11.3; range 0.2-26.4). During follow-up, 46/80 infants received FVIII for bleeding episodes (median 3 (P25-P75 1-6; range 1-108 lifetime EDs)) and/or concomitant prophylaxis (n=10). The model-based annualized bleeding rate was 0.6 (95%CI 0.4 – 1.1) with 56% experiencing zero treated bleeds, and no serious adverse events or thromboses were reported. Five infants (2 MTPs) developed FVIII inhibitors (3 high responders (>5.0 BU/mL)) after 4-18 exposure days to FVIII. These data support the safety and efficacy of early emicizumab prophylaxis. However, long-term effects on FVIII inhibitor development require further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→