MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417027144 · doi:10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100438

Deep intronic MSH2 variant confirms Muir-Torre subtype of Lynch syndrome

2025· article· en· W4417027144 on OpenAlexafffund
Fiona Chan‐Pak‐Choon, Andrew Y. Shuen, Evan Weber, Lili Fu, Bárbara Rivera, William D. Foulkes

Bibliographic record

VenueJID Innovations · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIICanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMerck CanadaPfizer
KeywordsLynch syndromeGenetic testingGermline mutationGermlineMSH2DNA sequencingExome sequencingDNA mismatch repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) can uncover clinically significant non-coding variants missed by standard germline testing, as demonstrated here in a patient with Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS), a subtype of Lynch syndrome (LS). In this case, despite a convincing clinical phenotype and immunohistochemical loss of MSH2/MSH6 in one of the patient's tumors, conventional gene panel testing failed to detect a germline pathogenic variant (GPV). WGS identified a deep intronic MSH2 variant, and tumor sequencing revealed somatic MSH2 mutations (second hits) across multiple tumors, confirming mismatch repair deficiency and establishing an LS diagnosis. This report underscores the limitations of routine genetic testing and highlights the clinical utility of WGS in identifying pathogenic variants in non-coding regions. It also emphasizes the role of dermatologists in recognizing cutaneous markers of hereditary cancer syndromes and the importance of interdisciplinary evaluation in guiding both patient care and familial risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJID InnovationsSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207