MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417034132 · doi:10.1007/s00330-025-12100-3

ESR Essentials: renal imaging in children—practice recommendations by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology

2025· article· en· W4417034132 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Woźniak, Damjana Ključevšek, Maria Beatrice Damasio, Maria Luisa Lobo, Hans‐Joachim Mentzel, Lil‐Sofie Ording Müller, Philippe Petit, Michael Riccabona, Samuel Stafrace, Anne Smets, Carmelo Sofia, Giulia Perucca

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Radiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's Hospital
FundersEuropean Maritime and Fisheries Fund
KeywordsNeuroradiologyUrinary systemInterventional radiologyReferralUltrasoundComputed tomographyKidneyPyelogramRenal pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renal pathology is common in childhood. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis of kidney diseases and encompasses a range of modalities. Advanced imaging is typically performed in specialised paediatric hospitals, where experienced paediatric radiologists are familiar with the relevant techniques, protocols, indications, and limitations. However, children are often first admitted to general hospitals, where radiologists may have more limited experience in paediatric imaging. Renal cysts in children differ from those in adults, most commonly presenting as cystic kidney diseases. In the majority of cases, ultrasound (US) is the sole diagnostic modality required. Imaging is not necessary for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI), but it is essential for detecting underlying anomalies and potential complications. Urinary tract dilatation is a common finding in children; however, only up to 30% of cases require further evaluation to diagnose urinary tract obstruction or vesicourinary reflux. Urolithiasis is relatively uncommon in children and is primarily diagnosed with US, although computed tomography (CT) may occasionally be necessary. Solid renal lesions identified on US should be further evaluated in highly specialised paediatric centres. Mild to moderate renal trauma can be diagnosed and monitored using US, whereas CT remains the modality of choice for assessing severe trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review provides general radiologists with a comprehensive overview of the normal renal appearance across paediatric age groups, including normal variants and imaging pathways for the most common renal pathologies in children. It also highlights scenarios where referral to specialised paediatric centres is necessary. KEY POINTS: US is the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing most renal pathologies in children. MRI is used in a variety of situations (e.g. complex congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, or focal lesions) when US is not sufficient. CT is reserved for emergencies and in selected cases of urolithiasis. Knowledge of normal renal features, including normal anatomical and morphological variants across different age groups, is essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean RadiologySame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207