MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417034259 · doi:10.1103/rx5x-f4vn

Numerical investigation of liquid jet breakup in crossflow with high-density ratio and high gaseous viscosity

2025· article· en· W4417034259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBreakupReynolds numberJet (fluid)Weber numberMomentum (technical analysis)Instability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid jets injected into crossflows characterized by very low gaseous Reynolds numbers, low momentum flux ratios, and extreme density ratios experience intensified bending, rapid surface stripping, and early column fracture compared with classical air-flow conditions. In this regime, ligament formation becomes strongly aligned with the crossflow, and instability waves wrap around the entire jet circumference rather than remaining on the windward side. Our results show that Kelvin--Helmholtz, rather than Rayleigh--Taylor, controls the breakup dynamics, with surface wavelengths remaining independent of the Weber number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it