MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417036183 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04071

On the Hypergraph Nash-Williams' Conjecture

2025· preprint· W4417036183 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cicely Henderson, Luke Postle

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHypergraphConjectureDivisibility ruleGeneralizationOrder (exchange)Constant (computer programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2014, Keevash proved the existence of $(n,q,r)$-Steiner systems (equivalently $K_q^r$-decompositions of $K_n^r$) for all large enough $n$ satisfying the necessary divisibility conditions. In 2021, Glock, Kühn, and Osthus proposed a generalization of this result. Namely they conjectured a hypergraph version of Nash-Williams' Conjecture positing that if a $K_q^r$-divisible $r$-graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has minimum $(r-1)$-degree (denoted $δ(G)$ hereafter) at least $\left(1-Θ_r\left(\frac{1}{q^{r-1}}\right)\right) \cdot n$, then $G$ admits a $K_q^r$-decomposition. The best known progress on this conjecture dates to the second proof of the Existence Conjecture by Glock, Kühn, Lo, and Osthus wherein they showed that $δ(G)\ge \left(1-\frac{c}{q^{2r}}\right)\cdot n$ suffices for large enough $n$, where $c$ is a constant depending on $r$ but not $q$. As for the fractional relaxation, the best known bound is due to Delcourt, Lesgourgues, and the second author, who proved that $δ(G)\ge \left(1-\frac{c}{q^{r-1 + o(1)}}\right)\cdot n$ guarantees a $K_q^r$-fractional decomposition. We prove that for every integer $r\ge 2$, there exists a real $c>0$ such that if a $K_q^r$-divisible $r$-graph $G$ satisfies $δ(G)\ge \max\left\{ δ_{K_q^r}^* + \varepsilon,~~1 -\frac{c}{\binom{q}{r-1}} \right\} \cdot n$, then $G$ admits a $K_q^r$-decomposition for all large enough $n$, where $δ_{K_q^r}^*$ denotes the fractional $K_q^r$-decomposition threshold. Combined with the fractional result above, this proves that $\left(1-\frac{c}{q^{r-1 + o(1)}}\right)\cdot n$ suffices for the Hypergraph Nash-Williams' Conjecture, approximately confirming the correct order of $q$. Our proof uses the newly developed method of refined absorption; we also develop a non-uniform Turán theory to prove the existence of many embeddings of absorbers which may be of independent interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryFrench-language works237,207