Outcomes of Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent or Progressive Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Multicenter International Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a noninvasive option for recurrent vestibular schwannoma (VS). This study evaluates outcomes in patients with long-term follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 81 patients with recurrent unilateral sporadic VS after initial SRS, with ≥12 months of follow-up. Outcomes included tumor control, hearing preservation, cranial nerve function, and adverse radiation effects (ARE). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression identified factors affecting outcomes. RESULTS: The median age at the second SRS was 60 years, with a median interval of 58 months between procedures. The median margin doses were 12.0 Gy (single-fraction), 17.25 Gy (3-fraction), and 25 Gy (5-fraction). Tumor control was achieved in 69 patients (85.2%), with 5- and 10-year local control rates of 82% and 76.5%, respectively. Significant predictors of local failure included tumor volume >2.2 cm 3 (area under the curve = 0.757, P = .018), prescription biological effective dose (BED) ≤70.3 Gy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89, P = .003), and interval between treatments >27.5 months (HR: 1.02, P = .015). In single-fraction SRS, higher prescription dose reduced failure risk (HR: 0.31, P = .002) with a margin dose ≥12 Gy being critical for improved tumor control ( P < .001). Serviceable hearing was retained in 12 of 18 cases (66.7%), and facial nerve function was preserved in 72 of 80 cases (90%). ARE occurred in 11 patients (13.6%), most commonly perilesional edema (63.7%). ARE correlated with higher brainstem maximum BED in the entire cohort (HR: 1.02, P = .016) and in single-fraction SRS (HR: 1.02, P = .006). Pseudoprogression (9.8%) was linked to younger age (HR: 0.88, P = .023) and shorter time between SRS (HR: 0.87, P = .012). CONCLUSION: Repeat SRS is an effective option for recurrent sporadic VS, offering high tumor control and functional preservation. Outcomes depend on age, interval between treatments, tumor volume, and BED. With careful planning, adverse effects are rare and typically transient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".