The neovaginal microbiota, symptoms, and local immune correlates in transfeminine individuals with penile inversion vaginoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transfeminine people (assigned male at birth) often undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty to create vulva, a clitoris and a vaginal canal (referred to as a neovagina). After vaginoplasty, transfeminine people frequently experience gynecological concerns, but their etiology is unknown due to a lack of knowledge of the neovaginal microenvironment. We characterized neovaginal microbiota and cytokines in 47 transfeminine participants. Participants self-reported sexual behaviors and symptoms, enabling correlation with bacterial (16S rRNA) and immune profiles. Four distinct clusters of co-occurring bacteria with unique immune profiles were identified. One cluster, which included Fastidiosipila, Ezakiella, and Murdochiella, was abundant, stable, and correlated with lower cytokines. Conversely, another cluster containing Howardella, Parvimonas, Fusobacterium, and Lawsonella was linked to higher cytokines. Although Lactobacillus was detected, Lactobacillus dominance was rare. These findings underscore the need for evidence-based clinical guidelines tailored to transfeminine gynecologic care, emphasizing the vital role of the neovaginal microbiome in symptom management and sexual health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".