MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417051969 · doi:10.1109/ton.2025.3636013

Energy Harvesting in Solar-Powered UAV Communication With Rate Splitting Multiple Access

2025· article· W4417051969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNanyang Technological UniversityAgency for Science, Technology and ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResource allocationEnergy harvestingLyapunov optimizationWirelessMarkov decision processCommunications systemOptimization problemThroughputResource management (computing)Adaptability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future wireless networks are anticipated to evolve by aerial communication platforms. Nonetheless, the operational lifespan and efficacy of transceivers such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) and Internet of Things (IoT) devices are strictly prohibited by their constrained onboard power sources. This paper focuses on an aerial network configuration where a UAV harvests solar power to serve energy-limited IoT devices through simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. In this setup, the UAV and the IoT devices, each are equipped with energy and data buffers. This system also benefits from rate splitting multiple access for efficient interference management. Upon optimizing the system efficacy, we formulate a long-term resource allocation problem to maximize the time-averaged energy efficiency. To address this stochastic and non-convex optimization problem, we propose a multi-stage solution strategy. Firstly, by leveraging Lyapunov optimization theory, we transform the long-term stochastic problem into an equivalent deterministic short-term form. Next, by recasting this equivalent problem into Markov decision process, we propose a resource allocation mechanism based on actor-critic hindsight experience replay (AC-HER), tailored to capture the problem dynamics and optimize its variables. Moreover, given the UAV high mobility and the system reconfigurations, we fortify the trained AC-HER model with meta-learning strategy, enhancing its adaptability to system variations. Simulations verified that the proposed resource allocation strategy considerably outperforms its counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it