Selbstdarstellungen und Grenzüberschreitungen in Judith Schalanskys Verzeichnis einiger Verluste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le recueil Verzeichnis einiger Verluste (2018) et ses paratextes, Judith Schalansky transgresse de multiples limites : celle entre les rôles d’autrice et de créatrice de livres, celle entre fiction littéraire et sciences ainsi que celle entre des rôles de genre traditionnels. Ses textes posent par ailleurs un regard résolument subjectif et critique sur les savoirs et les sciences. Enfin, des éléments autofictionnels brouillent les limites entre l’autrice et ses personnages. Ses transgressions des limites et son geste érudit et critique permettent à Schalansky d’occuper une position singulière de poeta docta dans le champ littéraire où elle mêle différentes postures de manière ludique et ironique. Ainsi, elle élargit le champ des possibles que Wilfried Barner a décrit pour le modèle d’auteur du poeta doctus et confère une nouvelle signature féminine à ce modèle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".