MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417056266 · doi:10.4000/15aeb

Selbstdarstellungen und Grenzüberschreitungen in Judith Schalanskys Verzeichnis einiger Verluste

2025· article· fr· W4417056266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches germaniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMemory, History, Trauma, Identity
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)History of literatureIndependence (probability theory)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le recueil Verzeichnis einiger Verluste (2018) et ses paratextes, Judith Schalansky transgresse de multiples limites : celle entre les rôles d’autrice et de créatrice de livres, celle entre fiction littéraire et sciences ainsi que celle entre des rôles de genre traditionnels. Ses textes posent par ailleurs un regard résolument subjectif et critique sur les savoirs et les sciences. Enfin, des éléments autofictionnels brouillent les limites entre l’autrice et ses personnages. Ses transgressions des limites et son geste érudit et critique permettent à Schalansky d’occuper une position singulière de poeta docta dans le champ littéraire où elle mêle différentes postures de manière ludique et ironique. Ainsi, elle élargit le champ des possibles que Wilfried Barner a décrit pour le modèle d’auteur du poeta doctus et confère une nouvelle signature féminine à ce modèle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it