MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417071899 · doi:10.31083/ceog39182

Prevalence of Fetal Structural Anomalies and Genetic Testing in Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency: A Single-Center Cohort Study and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Comparing Latin America and Other Regions

2025· article· en· W4417071899 on OpenAlexaff
Tania T. Herrera, Idalina Cubilla‐Batista, Amador Goodridge, Yovani Edgar Chávez Rodríguez, Anthonier Hinestroza, Jorge David Mendez-Rios, Ameth Hawkins-Villarreal

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansGenetic testingFetusConfidence intervalCohort studyCohortRetrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is the recommended genetic test for fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT); however, its use in Latin America remains limited. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of genetic testing in fetuses with increased NT in Panama and across Latin America. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1512 women who underwent first-trimester screening in Panama, along with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting genetic testing in Latin America. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE (via PubMed), Epistemonikos, LILACS, BRISA, SciELO, and Google Scholar, covering studies from inception to June 2023 was updated to December 2023. The extracted data included population, setting, timing, and genetic testing methods. The Joanna Briggs Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Among 1236 fetuses in the Panamanian cohort, 77 (6.23%) had NT ≥95th percentile. The systematic review included 11 studies encompassing 842 fetuses diagnosed with increased NT. The overall proportion of fetuses undergoing invasive testing was 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.33). Anomalies were found in 63% of cases with increased NT. CMA was not reported in any of the studies. Conclusions: Most patients in Latin America do not undergo invasive testing, and conventional karyotyping remains the most frequently performed method. To date, no studies have reported the use of CMA in this context. Therefore, the findings of this study highlight significant gaps in access to genetic testing, emphasizing the need for strategic initiatives to improve test availability and build capacity for implementing microarray analysis in the region. Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD42023398899; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023398899).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207