Differential developmental influences on anxiety in adulthood: Behavioral inhibition moderates the dimensions of social involvement predicting anxiety in adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current 20-year longitudinal study examined whether behavioral inhibition (BI), a temperament identified in late infancy/early childhood, moderates the associations between a) peer connectedness (feelings of closeness, ease, and availability of meaningful social bonds), b) frequency of functional support (how often interpersonal supportive behaviors are received) throughout middle childhood and adolescence, and c) adulthood anxiety. Data from 291 participants were analyzed. Participants were selected during infancy based on their level of reactivity to novel social and nonsocial stimuli, and BI was measured in toddlerhood. Participants completed questionnaires assessing social involvement throughout middle childhood and adolescence, and anxiety in early adulthood. Confirmatory factor analyses extracted factor scores from multiple indicators for peer connectedness, frequency of functional support, and anxiety. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the moderating effects of toddlerhood BI on the association between indices of social involvement and adulthood anxiety. BI moderates the relations between social involvement and adulthood anxiety; higher frequency of functional support in the presence of relatively low BI predicted lower adulthood anxiety ( t = -2.49, SE =.010, p = .014). Peer connectedness directly and positively predicted adulthood anxiety ( ß = 0.24, p= .016), but, BI did not moderate this association ( p = .606), nor was there a main effect of BI on adult anxiety ( p = .129). Complex relations manifest among toddlerhood BI, social involvement across development, and anxiety in adulthood. These relations reflect interacting risk and protective factors operating in a developmental context. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".