MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417076129 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.128066

Effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine booster dose on prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in British Columbia, 2003–2018

2025· article· en· W4417076129 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Chia‐Yuan Chang, Sharifa Nasreen, Manish Sadarangani, Jacquelyn J. Cragg, Fawziah Marra

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Immunization Research Network
KeywordsBooster (rocketry)Pneumococcal conjugate vaccineBooster dosePneumococcal diseaseIncidence (geometry)SchedulePneumococcal infectionsStreptococcus pneumoniaeConjugate vaccine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) remains a major cause of morbidity in children despite the routine use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in childhood immunization programs. While the effectiveness of different vaccination schedules is well established, the additional benefit of the booster dose remains unknown. This study estimated the incidence of IPD by vaccination status in children under 18 years of age in British Columbia (BC), Canada, from 2003 to 2018. METHODS: IPD cases were identified through laboratory surveillance and vaccination records obtained from provincial immunization registries. We estimated annual IPD incidence using Poisson regression, with the offset being the population at risk derived from immunization coverage rates. We calculated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) stratified by serotype group, age, and vaccine period. RESULTS: Among 598 IPD cases, 53.2 % were unvaccinated, 31.8 % received 2-3 primary doses and 1 booster dose (primary + booster), 15.1 % received 1-3 primary doses (primary only). Annual adjusted incidence per 100,000 was 36.1 (unvaccinated), 11.6 (primary only), and 4.6 (primary + booster). Compared to unvaccinated children, aIRRs were 0.13 (95 % CI: 0.10-0.17) for primary + booster and 0.32 (95 % CI, 0.22-0.48) for primary only. The primary + booster group had a 61 % lower incidence than the primary-only group (aIRR 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.60). These patterns were consistent across age groups (<12 months, 12-23 months, 2-4 years, 5-9 years, and 10-18 years) and serotype groups (PCV7, additional PCV13, and non-PCV13). No significant differences in aIRR were observed between PCV7 (2003-2010) and PCV13 (2010-2018) eras. CONCLUSIONS: A schedule including a booster dose was associated with a significantly lower incidence of IPD. These findings support promoting the full primary + booster (2 + 1) schedule to reduce IPD burden in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccine→Same topicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→French-language works237,207→