MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417076665 · doi:10.1159/000549465

Reference Values of Cerebral Fractional Tissue Oxygen Extraction in Preterm Neonates during Immediate Foetal-to-Neonatal Transition: A Secondary Outcome Analysis of the COSGOD III Trial

2025· article· en· W4417076665 on OpenAlexaff
Christina H. Wolfsberger, Bernhard Schwaberger, Alexander Avian, Katharina Goeral, Marlene Hammerl, Tina Perme, Eugene Dempsey, Laila Springer, Gianluca Lista, Tomasz Szczapa, Hans J. Fuchs, Łukasz Karpiński, Jenny Bua, Brenda Hiu Yan Law, Julia Buchmayer, Ursula Kiechl‐Kohlendorfer, Lilijana Kornhauser-Cerar, Christoph E. Schwarz, Kerstin Gründler, Ilaria Stucchi, Katrin Klebermaß-Schrehof, Georg M. Schmölzer, Gerhard Pichler

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alexandra HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReference valuesOxygenationClinical trialReference rangeGestationCentral nervous system disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Monitoring cerebral oxygenation during immediate foetal-to-neonatal transition may provide additional information in preterm neonates. Cerebral fractional tissue oxygen extraction (cFTOE), derived from cerebral oxygen saturation (crSO<sub>2</sub>) and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), reflects the relative extraction of oxygen from the arterial to the tissue compartment, providing information about the balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. We aimed to describe centiles of cFTOE during the first 15 min after birth in extremely and very preterm neonates. Methods: This is a secondary outcome parameter analysis of the multicentre randomised-controlled COSGOD III trial. Neonates <32 weeks of gestational age included in the near-infrared spectroscopy-open group of the COSGOD III trial with favourable outcome, defined as survival without cerebral injury at term-equivalent age, were assigned for this analysis. CFTOE was calculated for every minute in each included neonate: cFTOE = (SpO<sub>2</sub>-crSO<sub>2</sub>)/SpO<sub>2</sub>. CrSO2 was measured with the INVOS 5100 monitor with the neonatal sensor. Centiles of cFTOE (10th to 90th) from minute 2 to 15 after birth were described. Results: A total of 199 preterm neonates with a median (interquartile range) gestational age of 29.7 (27.7–30.9) weeks and a weight of 1,200 (925–1,460) g were analysed. The 50th centile of cFTOE at minute 2, 5, 10, and 15 was 0.492, 0.296, 0.177, and 0.151, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides centile for cFTOE for extremely and very preterm neonates with favourable outcome independent of interventions during postnatal stabilisation period. These centile charts may assist in interpreting cerebral oxygenation patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207