Simulation and Analysis of Fully Adiabatic Circuit Designing with Single Power Clock for High-Frequency Low-Power VLSI Circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adiabatic logic guarantees vast diminishments of power utilization since it doesn't disperse power. This paper audits ongoing advancements in adiabatic circuits. First, the fully adiabatic circuit designing technology called pass-transistor adiabatic logic (PTAL) is discussed. Next, the operation of the dual-rail logic and the power clock supply with the logic operation of the PTAL technology is discussed. Further, many basic logic circuits using the PTAL technology are designed, compiled, and simulated. Finally, the performance results, power dissipation, speed, efficiency, and load analysis of the circuits are compared with the conventional and existing CMOS technologies under the same simulation conditions using standard 45nm technology with VDD = 1V and prove that even at high frequencies above 2GHz, it can outperform the dominating conventional CMOS logic designing in the field of power dissipation. The simulation results are provided to support our claim. We used 45nm technology for all our simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".