MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417077185 · doi:10.63878/cjssr.v3i4.1608

Post-Truth Ecologies and Manufactured Realities: The Collapse of Knowledge, Media Myths, and Environmental Justice in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake

2025· article· W4417077185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Syeda Khadija Zainab

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Journal of Social Science Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOryxEnvironmental justiceIndigenousEnvironmental degradationEcocriticismNarrativeMeaning (existential)Economic Justice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the contemporary discourse, where truth is debatable and environmental collapse is excruciatingly institutionalized, Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake (2003) accentuates a narrative that interrogates the mitigation of moral and ecological failures of post-truth culture. The tragedies that characterize the twenty-first century, when facts, social duty, and ecological awareness are subservient to business, are all irresistibly immersed in Atwood's speculative work. These include genetic trickery, corporate supremacy, and the monetization of life. This research analyzes Oryx and Crake within the discourse of post-truth and environmental justice in Canada. It positions Atwood's novel as a source of work that discloses how neoliberal capitalism, corporate media, and technology work together to corrode the very notion of truth. Her perspective of dystopia reflects not only a catastrophic environmental disaster along the spectrum of the entire world but also an especially Canadian anxiety about resource exploitation and colonial histories, along with an erasure of Indigenous ecological epistemologies. In Atwood's post-apocalyptic world, environmental degradation reflects the collapse of meaning itself and the end of nature becomes indiscernible as well as indistinguishable from the end of truth. By analyzing myth-media-ecological ethics intersections, this research investigates how Atwood modify environmental degradation as a metaphor for epistemic decay. Through the lens of Indigenous Environmental Thought and post-truth studies, this paper argues that Oryx and Crake initiates a critique of settler narratives of mastery and progress. Atwood's fiction thus functions as both ecological warning and epistemological restoration. It demands a reenvisioning of justice in which truth and the environment are not oxymoronic but they are collectively sustaining and preserving the modes of reality. This research paper demonstrates that how Oryx and Crake illustrates the entanglement and enmeshment of post-truth discourses, ecological crash, and Indigenous environmental justice and what Atwood's speculative vision accentuates about the moral and epistemological failures of the present day Canadian and global post-truth era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.065
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Journal of Social Science ReviewSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207