MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417079103 · doi:10.1080/14737140.2025.2600641

The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases characteristics in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a scoping review

2025· review· en· W4417079103 on OpenAlexaff
Gurvir Singh Dhutt, Laura Burney Ellis, Sam M. Wiseman

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Anticancer Therapy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologyLymph nodeFocus (optics)Lymph node metastasisThyroidPapillary thyroid cancerClinical significanceInterpretation (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Despite neck lymph node metastases occurring commonly in cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), there has remained controversy regarding the thresholds that should be used for lymph node characteristics in predicting PTC recurrence risk. AREAS COVERED: This scoping review explored the prognostic significance of lymph node characteristics in predicting risk of PTC recurrence. Following the PRISMA guidelines, the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched and supplemented by hand searching reference lists to identify articles published from database inception until October 2024. A total of 172 studies were included. Most studies had a retrospective cohort design and were reported from South Korea, Japan, and China. In general, an increased number of metastatic lymph nodes (commonly >5), presence of extranodal cancer extension, larger size of metastatic lymph nodes (commonly >3 cm), higher lymph node ratio (commonly ≥0.3 or ≥0.4), and presence of lateral neck compartment nodal metastases were all associated with higher recurrence rates. EXPERT OPINION: The lack of standardized definitions and terminology make the interpretation of findings difficult and limit generalizability. Future studies must focus on exploring long-term recurrence risk, in an exclusively PTC patient population, while also incorporating standardized definitions and terminology for lymph node characteristics and recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0130.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Anticancer TherapySame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207