MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417079814 · doi:10.1016/j.amf.2025.200277

High-performance PEEK for 4D printing by confining the PEEK powder within photocurable polymer network

2025· article· en· W4417079814 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Junhui Gong, Zhangzhang Tang, Xinrui Zhang, Xianqiang Pei, Jianming Li, Qihua Wang, Yaoming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditive Manufacturing Frontiers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTaishan Scholar Project of Shandong ProvinceChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Anesthesiologists' Society
KeywordsPeekPolymerComposite numberThermoplastic compositesThermoplastic polymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) is widely used in aerospace applications as a self-lubricating material owing to its exceptional mechanical strength and thermal stability. Although fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing is commonly employed for PEEK fabrication, the precise printing of complex and intricate structures remains challenging. In this study, we developed a novel 3D printing strategy for the precise molding of high-performance PEEK using digital light processing (DLP) to print a photocurable resin, in which ACMO-PEGDA (PACMO) was blended with commercial PEEK powder. In the photocured structure, PEEK powder was confined within the elastic crosslinking network. Each 3D printed PEEK sample underwent individual phase transitions in response to temperature changes. Experimental results confirmed an exceptional shape memory performance, with shape fixation and recovery ratios exceeding 94%. The 4D printed PEEK components exhibited high strength and facilitated the transition from 2D to 3D complex structures. Furthermore, the fabricated components demonstrated an exceptionally low coefficient of friction of below 0.1, offering a groundbreaking solution for customized production of advanced wear-resistant mechanical components. This study represents a significant advancement in PEEK processing technology, establishes new paradigms for high-performance PEEK 3D/4D printing, and opens new avenues for the development of next-generation intelligent devices with enhanced performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditive Manufacturing FrontiersSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207