Micro Level Construction of HIV/AIDS Disease Causality, Retribution and Changes in Living Arrangement with People Living With HIV/AIDS in a Rural Setting in Ghana: A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundCommunity perception, illness definition and meaning attribution to the causes and justification for the consequence of HIV acquisition on People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWH) cumulatively affect their health-seeking behaviours, stigmatisation, quality of life and survival. The study examines rural Ghanaian dwellers construction of why and how people contract HIV/AIDS and their perception and attitudes towards PLWH.MethodsQualitative case study design and approach with purposive and snowballing sampling techniques facilitated the selection of 15 adult participants comprising two PLWH and other key informants from a rural Ghanaian community. A semi-structured interview guide aided in the collection of data from the participants. Data collected were analysed using NVivo 8 and presented using comparative emerging themes.FindingsParticipants from the community demonstrated varying perceptions and attitudes towards PLWH. Contraction of HIV/AIDS by a person was construed by community members to result from a person's lived unrestricted sexual lifestyle, accidental acquisition, predestination to contract the virus and punishment from ancestors. Others perceived PLWH as just normal beings with a foreign virus. Community-level causal explanations on why people acquired HIV were shaped by community members' educational attainment, religious doctrines and inherent tenets, fear of the virus, regard for professional ethics and perceptions on PLWH gift reception.ConclusionsPublic education and awareness creation interventions should be re-intensified and delivered beyond urban and peri-urban centres to reach core PLWH and their community members within rural communities. Sustained micro-level education on HIV/AIDS awareness with feedback input is critical to stigma reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".