MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417105092 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7941767/v1

A randomized controlled study on the effects of the T-REX Twente (Thoracic Surgical Rehabilitation Experts Twente) sternal precautions on quality of life and physical activity levels in cardiac surgery patients, compared to standard care in patients following a median sternotomy: the study protocol

2025· preprint· en· W4417105092 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole Wielens, Kim Roerdink, Winston Lynch, Lauren Esau, Job van der Palen, Frank R. Halfwerk

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical site infection prevention
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
FundersAlberta Health Services
KeywordsQuality of life (healthcare)RehabilitationMedian sternotomyRandomized controlled trialAnxietyCardiac surgeryMyocardial infarctionThorax (insect anatomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In 2023, a majority (86%) of open-heart surgeries was performed at Thorax Centrum Twente (TCT) via a full median sternotomy. Currently, there is no consensus on post-operative sternal precautions following full median sternotomy. Research from the U.S.A. and Canada suggests that existing restrictive sternal precautions may not be necessary. More lenient sternal precautions, such as the "Keep Your Move in the Tube" principle, have shown positive outcomes, with no significant complications. Patients following this approach experienced fewer mobility issues and reported improved quality of life and reduced anxiety. This study explores the potential benefits of fewer restrictions, which could reduce patient anxiety and lead to fewer follow-up visits. This study aims to determine whether the Thoracic Surgical Rehabilitation Experts Twente (T-REX Twente) sternal precautions have a small positive effect on the Modified MacNew Quality of Life after Myocardial Infarction questionnaire (QLMI-2), physical activity, and reduction of movement-related anxiety in patients after full median sternotomy, compared to standard restrictive sternal precautions. It also assesses whether the T-REX sternal precautions result in no negative effects on pain, wound healing, or post-operative complications. Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study will include adult patients undergoing full median sternotomy at TCT between June 2024 and June 2026, all participating in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Exclusion criteria include intensive care unit stays over 72 hours, delirium, dementia, severe cognitive impairments, language barriers, or treatment by a non-TCT-affiliated cardiologist. The control group will adhere to current restrictive sternal precautions, whereas those in the intervention group will follow the T-REX sternal precautions, which allow lifting, pushing, or pulling as long as arm movement remains within a defined “tube”. The primary endpoint is the change in QLMI-2 from baseline (T 0 ) to start of phase II cardiac rehabilitation(T 4 ). Discussion: The T-REX Twente sternal precautions may improve quality of life, physical activity and reduce movement-related anxiety, supporting the idea that less restrictive post-operative sternal precautions can enhance patient outcomes. Trial Registration: CCMO Trial Register NL78107.100.23 Registered on 29 February 2024. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06115759

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicSurgical site infection preventionFrench-language works237,207