MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417115263 · doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101107

Facial soft tissue changes in patients following rapid maxillary expansion in children: A systematic review

2025· article· en· W4417115263 on OpenAlexaff
Nafisa Marium Molla, Raisa Queiroz Catunda, Karla Carpio Horta, Heesoo Oh, Manuel O. Lagravère

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Orthodontics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft tissueNoseCephalometryNasolabial foldMaxilla

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Non-surgical rapid maxillary expansion (RME) has been widely investigated regarding skeletal effects, although fewer studies have assessed the associated soft tissue changes, which is an important factor to consider, as orthodontic treatment aims to achieve occlusal harmony and an aesthetically pleasing soft tissue balance. This systematic review examines the existing literature on facial soft tissue changes following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in children with a maxillary transverse deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted up to July 2025 in four major databases, including Embase (via Ovid), Medline (via Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies focused on children receiving RME were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions. This review followed the protocols recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 1379 articles found, 15 included PICOS-based inclusion criteria: five randomized controlled trials, four cohort studies, and six controlled clinical trials. Alar width (0.5 to 2.21mm), alar base width (0.17 to 2.81mm), and nasolabial angle (0.9 degrees) increased significantly after RME treatment. Five studies were found to have a low risk of bias, seven had a moderate risk of bias, one had a serious risk of bias, and two had some concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RME results in variable soft tissue facial changes over time. The findings resulted statistically significant for alar width, alar base width, and nasolabial angle, showing changes in the facial soft tissues after non-surgical rapid maxillary expansion, especially in the nasal area. These results, which are directly related to the anatomical effects of the rapid maxillary expansion, need careful consideration by clinicians as the skeletal and the consequent soft tissue changes may be influenced by different factors, i.e. patient age, appliance activation and follow-up duration. PROSPERO reference number: CRD42024505738.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational OrthodonticsSame topicOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsFrench-language works237,207