Leveraging orbital dynamics with RF signal features for satellite multi-orbit proximity threat detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proximity-based interference is a growing threat to satellite communications, driven by dense multi-orbit constellations and increasingly agile adversarial maneuvers. We propose a hybrid simulation framework that integrates orbital maneuver modeling with RF signal degradation analysis to detect and classify suspicious proximity operations. Using the open-source Maneuver Detection Data Generation (MaDDG) library from MIT Lincoln Laboratory, we generate labeled datasets combining impulsive maneuver profiles with radio-frequency (RF) impacts across a range of behavioral intents—routine station-keeping, covert shadowing, and overt jamming. Our approach fuses kinematic features such as range, velocity, acceleration, and Time of Closest Approach (TCA), with RF metrics including Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), throughput, and Jammer-to-Signal Ratio (JSR). These features are further enhanced with temporal derivatives and rolling-window statistics to capture subtle or transient interference patterns. A Random Forest classifier trained on this fused feature set achieves 94.67% accuracy and a macro F1 score of 0.9471, outperforming models using only kinematic or RF inputs. The system is particularly effective in detecting covert threats, such as surveillance or intermittent jamming, that evade RF-only methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".