MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417118667 · doi:10.1049/icp.2025.4051

Leveraging orbital dynamics with RF signal features for satellite multi-orbit proximity threat detection

2025· article· en· W4417118667 on OpenAlexaff
Anouar Boumeftah, Güneş Karabulut Kurt

Bibliographic record

VenueIET conference proceedings. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestKinematicsSatelliteClassifier (UML)SIGNAL (programming language)Feature extractionCovertPattern recognition (psychology)Set (abstract data type)Interference (communication)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proximity-based interference is a growing threat to satellite communications, driven by dense multi-orbit constellations and increasingly agile adversarial maneuvers. We propose a hybrid simulation framework that integrates orbital maneuver modeling with RF signal degradation analysis to detect and classify suspicious proximity operations. Using the open-source Maneuver Detection Data Generation (MaDDG) library from MIT Lincoln Laboratory, we generate labeled datasets combining impulsive maneuver profiles with radio-frequency (RF) impacts across a range of behavioral intents—routine station-keeping, covert shadowing, and overt jamming. Our approach fuses kinematic features such as range, velocity, acceleration, and Time of Closest Approach (TCA), with RF metrics including Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), throughput, and Jammer-to-Signal Ratio (JSR). These features are further enhanced with temporal derivatives and rolling-window statistics to capture subtle or transient interference patterns. A Random Forest classifier trained on this fused feature set achieves 94.67% accuracy and a macro F1 score of 0.9471, outperforming models using only kinematic or RF inputs. The system is particularly effective in detecting covert threats, such as surveillance or intermittent jamming, that evade RF-only methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET conference proceedings.Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207